Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/httpd/vhost/vo.oas.psu.ac.th/html/lib/adodb/adodb.inc.php on line 870

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/httpd/vhost/vo.oas.psu.ac.th/html/lib/adodb/adodb.inc.php on line 876

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/httpd/vhost/vo.oas.psu.ac.th/html/lib/adodb/adodb.inc.php on line 1187

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/httpd/vhost/vo.oas.psu.ac.th/html/lib/adodb/adodb.inc.php on line 2017

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/httpd/vhost/vo.oas.psu.ac.th/html/lib/adodb/adodb.inc.php on line 3094

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/httpd/vhost/vo.oas.psu.ac.th/html/lib/adodb/adodb.inc.php on line 3671

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/httpd/vhost/vo.oas.psu.ac.th/html/lib/adodb/adodb.inc.php on line 3746

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/httpd/vhost/vo.oas.psu.ac.th/html/lib/adodb/adodb.inc.php on line 3766
 
 

Managing a Workshop Assignment

A Workshop Assignment is more complex than an ordinary assignment. It involves a number of steps or phases. These are

  1. The assessment of the assignment should be broken into a number of assessment ELEMENTS. This makes the grading of an assignment less arbitary and gives the students a framework on which to make assessments. The teacher has the role of setting up the assessment elements thus making a grading sheet. (See that page for more details.)

    With the assessment elements set up the teacher will normally submit a small number of example pieces of work. These are practice pieces for the students to assess before preparing their own pieces of work. However, before the assignment is made available to students, these example pieces should be assessed by the teacher. This provides the teacher with specimen "answers" when reviewing the students' assessments of those examples (produced in the next phase).

    The submission of example pieces of work by the teacher is optional and for certain assignments may not be appropriate.

  2. The assignment is now opened to the students. If the teacher has set up example pieces of work the students are required to assess a specified number of these. (The number of assessments was given when the assignment was created.) Once a student has made the required number of assessments they can then submit their own work. In the case of an assignment with no examples, the students are free to submit their own work without any delay.

    When a student submits a piece of work the teacher can, if desired, assess that work. This assessment can be incorporated into the student's final grade. These assessments can take place either during the submission phase of the assignment or after the submission deadline.

    If the assignment incorporates peer assessment, students who have submitted work are shown other students' work to assess. When they have made an assessment their peer can see that assessment. The student who submitted the work can comment on the assessment if that option was chosen for this assignment. The teacher can, if desired, grade these peer assessments and these scores can be taken forward towards the students' final grades (but that is not really necessary in many cases, see the next phase).

  3. After the deadline has passed, the teacher moves the assignment to the next phase where further submissions and assessments by students are not allowed. The teacher can, if wished, complete the grading of assessments made on the examples and the grading of the student submissions. They can also grade the peer assessments made by the students. This is NOT really necessary as, provided a reason number of assessments have been made on each submission, the "grading performance" of each student can be determined from the relative scores.

    When the grading has been completed, the teacher calculates the final grades of the students. These final grades are normally made up of three components, teacher's grade of the student's work, mean peer grade of the student's work and the student's grading performance. The last can include the mean "grading grade" entered by the teacher against a student's comments. These three components are given weights by the teacher before the calculation of the final grades takes place.

  4. The final phase of the assignment is entered to allow the students to see their final grades. The teacher can, if desired, backtrack the assignment to allow some adjustment of, say, the weights used in the final grade calculation, the revised grades can then be shown to the students.

    The students (and the teacher) are also shown a "League Table" of the student submissions. These are listed in order of grade, the top submission is first. Here the grade given to the submission is a combination of the teacher's grade and the average of the peer grades (if they are available). The weighting used is that given during the previous phase.

At any phase of the assignment the teacher can open the "Administration" page. This shows the current state of the assignment. It lists the Teacher's example submissions (if any), the students' assessments (of the teacher's examples, their own work, and of other students' submissions), and the submissions of the students. The teacher can use this page to assess and re-assess submissions, grade and re-grade assessments, delete submissions and assessments, and generally watch the progress of the assignment.

ดัชนีของแฟ้มช่วยเหลือทั้งหมด